Friday, October 03, 2008

What does it mean to be THIRSTY?



So I just watched this movie...AND DID I MISS SOMETHING? The best thing about this movie is the box art. When someone is Thirsty, it usually means that they will be drinking something, No?

Well in this film, not one damn person had anything to drink. It didn't even have to be piss. They could have just opened a bottle of water and drank it and I would have been happy...BUT NOT ONE PERSON DRANK ANYTHING!

It seemed VERY LOW BUDGET! It really didn't seem like a Michael Lucas film...
Michael Lucas is a master at positions and angles while fucking. The opening scene lacked it all. The fucking was boring and completely unconnected. Then out of NO WHERE they pull out a Anal Speculum and stick it in the bottoms ass and the top just pisses in his ass. NOW, this scene could have KIND OF been saved IF, after the top was done pissing in the bottom's ass, if the bottom would have shot the piss out of his ass and into the top's mouth and he would have drank it..ie full filling the Title of the movie, THIRSTY!




The second scene was not as disappointing as the first, but nothing to write home about. Again the fucking was very UN-LUCAS. It was a little better, but I was expecting more. Then out pops the infamous double-sided extra long black dildo that we've been seeing in all of his films lately...and for the first time I didn't enjoy it. The top didn't really know how to use it. It looked more like he was trying to unclog a drain. It was the MOST unsexual use of a dildo that i've ever seen. I did love that the bottom was hard for most of the fucking. He wasn't bad looking either. But Again no one was quite THIRSTY in this scene. The bottom looked horrified as the top pissed and came in his mouth. The Cum barely even touched his tongue before he was spitting it back out, and I think he only swallowed a bit of the piss on accident because the top was pissing so much, that he couldn't spit it out fast enough. So some of it slid down his throat...Poor Bastard. His face was priceless.



The last 2 scenes are just fucking LAUGHABLE!
The third one was just completely ridiculous. THERE WAS NOT ONE GOOD THING ABOUT IT. The fucking was miserably BORING. Just the shooting alone SUCKED. The scene ends with one guy cumming and the other guy can't even bring himself to put his tongue on it, and the other guy won't even let it get close to his mouth. The guys cums on his cheek and chest...THEN, we cut to them outside and one is pissing on the others ASS...WHAT???



The last scene started off GREAT! The cover model is in this scene and he's a catch. He whips out that double-sided dildo and uses it well on the bottom. The bottom also has a very nice rhythm on it. Not only is the cover model hot, but he can fuck as well. I am very pleased at this point. NOW, things take a turn for the worse...The Top pulls out and shoots this amazing load...
The fucking Bottom closes his eyes, barely sticks out his tongue and tenses up like he was about to be punched by Mike Tyson. He looked Terrified. Then we cut to the bath room, and the top is pissing on the bottom. NOW THIS WAS JUST THE COMPLETE WORST PART OF THE FILM, the bottoms was holding on to the top's dick and maneuvering it all around his chest...EVERYWHERE but his face and mouth. It was fucking HYSTERICAL.



NOT one of these men wanted Piss or Cum anywhere near their mouths. This was Hideous Casting, and a Terrible film. Thank goodness for the box art and the cover model.
Michael Lucas did not direct this film, Jozsef Budai did the honors. Mr.Lucas, I would take my name off this film if I were you.

The New title of this film should be, "I'm not quite Thirsty, but you can piss on my ass if you'd like"



Vote for my blog!


4 comments:

Y said...

That was a hysterical review:)))
I can`t believe Michael came up with a bad product like this one!I haven`t seen this movie but your screenshots said it all.Michael definitely can make a far better flic.He just can do it!

You know Jr,sometimes when I watch a porn movie,I just sit and waste my nerves and think by myself-These guys shooting the flick are so lucky.They have cameras in their hands,they have[sometimes] fucking gorgeous models to direct and they JUST DON`T DO ANYTHING INTERESTING with all that.And this makes me think that I would`ve done that movie better if I was there behind the cameras.
A certain director should ask himself Is that movie he`s directing now actually a movie he himself would enjoy.

Jr said...

Seriously Toni, It was such a waste.
I may not be a huge fan of Michael Lucas's but I DO LOVE HIS WORK and when I saw the Box Art was I was sold...HOLY FUCK WAS IT A LET DOWN.
It was a complete foreign release. Not one word was spoken in the film. All Sex...BAD SEX. The Title is incredibly misleading...

Anonymous said...

hahahahahahahahahahahahhahaha
hahahahahahahhahahahahahahhaah
hahahahahahahahahhahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahhaa
hahahahahahahahahahaha

mascdudewriter2 said...

That second scene could've been saved if the top just shoved his dick in the kid's mouth. I don't care that the bottom looked grossed out and humiliated, but I at least wanna know the top was enjoying himself...